1c:I[41658,["67895","static/chunks/67895-b5fa084832a2d3be.js","51219","static/chunks/51219-5620f8acea6536a8.js","27501","static/chunks/27501-b81020cf9f612c88.js","40430","static/chunks/40430-9b4d144f4e63e85b.js","85405","static/chunks/85405-4629db2ab7d80b03.js","16725","static/chunks/16725-c775e512206b762d.js","11272","static/chunks/11272-5cb5a9c0e51c3cac.js","28860","static/chunks/28860-473b689f2c736e27.js","11621","static/chunks/11621-dab816603cd195b7.js","17190","static/chunks/17190-6f2912f2e8e93809.js","83799","static/chunks/83799-75b851029f8ead66.js","22594","static/chunks/22594-b6e9d17969c7b505.js","91009","static/chunks/91009-2606db4f83830b09.js","14825","static/chunks/14825-4b92e7fb615135c7.js","91251","static/chunks/91251-342071341969cc75.js","85539","static/chunks/85539-57c4de78f1bfdd64.js","80193","static/chunks/80193-a76def5c4896f596.js","2113","static/chunks/2113-5c75a2999da4ec66.js","56007","static/chunks/56007-469ec3cc943d6cb6.js","91014","static/chunks/app/(public)/action-advisor/%5B...action%5D/page-1528f3eacfaabd4b.js"],"ActionAdvisorScorecardClient",1] 1d:T48e,Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions (memalign, posix_memalign, aligned_alloc) in the GNU C Library version 2.30 to 2.42 may result in an integer overflow, which could consequently result in a heap corruption. Note that the attacker must have control over both, the size as well as the alignment arguments of the memalign function to be able to exploit this. The size parameter must be close enough to PTRDIFF_MAX so as to overflow size_t along with the large alignment argument. This limits the malicious inputs for the alignment for memalign to the range [1<<62+ 1, 1<<63] and exactly 1<<63 for posix_memalign and aligned_alloc. Typically the alignment argument passed to such functions is a known constrained quantity (e.g. page size, block size, struct sizes) and is not attacker controlled, because of which this may not be easily exploitable in practice. An application bug could potentially result in the input alignment being too large, e.g. due to a different buffer overflow or integer overflow in the application or its dependent libraries, but that is again an uncommon usage pattern given typical sources of alignments.1e:T48e,Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions (memalign, posix_memalign, aligned_alloc) in the GNU C Library version 2.30 to 2.42 may result in an integer overflow, which could consequently result in a heap corruption. Note that the attacker must have control over both, the size as well as the alignment arguments of the memalign function to be able to exploit this. The size parameter must be close enough to PTRDIFF_MAX so as to overflow size_t along with the large alignment argument. This limits the malicious inputs for the alignment for memalign to the range [1<<62+ 1, 1<<63] and exactly 1<<63 for posix_memalign and aligned_alloc. Typically the alignment argument passed to such functions is a known constrained quantity (e.g. page size, block size, struct sizes) and is not attacker controlled, because of which this may not be easily exploitable in practice. An application bug could potentially result in the input alignment being too large, e.g. due to a different buffer overflow or integer overflow in the application or its dependent libraries, but that is again an uncommon usage pattern given typical sources of alignments.1f:T540,Issue summary: Parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData message with maliciously crafted AEAD parameters can trigger a stack buffer overflow. Impact summary: A stack buffer overflow may lead to a crash, causing Denial of Service, or potentially remote code execution. When parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData structures that use AEAD ciphers such as AES-GCM, the IV (Initialization Vector) encoded in the ASN.1 parameters is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without verifying that its length fits the destination. An attacker can supply a crafted CMS message with an oversized IV, causing a stack-based out-of-bounds write before any authentication or tag verifi

	becheran/mlc
Score	Start free trial to unlock No credit card required
License
Maintained
Vulnerabilities
Docker vulnerabilities
Branch protection
Manual code review
Secure publishing
Signed commits
Automated security tools
Popular	Used by 98 open-source projects
Security Policy	security policy file not detected

becheran/mlc